Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 2226 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 36% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 117 vs 86 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
