Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 15 days older than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 69 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 1% better in War Thunder than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 142 vs 140 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5629 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |