Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2976 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 69 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 183 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$437.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $437.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |