Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 3628 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 69 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 11% better in Rocket League than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 754 vs 682 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
754
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$308
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $308 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1894 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |