Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms Xeon E3-1231 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 2501 days newer than Xeon E3-1231 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1231 v3 - 122 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3053 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |