Key Differences
In short — Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Xeon E3-1230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core Ultra 9 185H is 4638 days newer than Xeon E3-1230.
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
- Performs up to 11% better in Dead Space than Xeon E3-1230 - 161 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 22 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1230
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core Ultra 9 185H
Mobile • Dec 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1230
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
588
24.489795918367346%
Multi-Core
1975
17.19784047370254%
Intel Xeon E3-1230 | vs | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 14th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ultra 9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | METEOR LAKE |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 2049 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 22 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 128EU |
| No | Overclockable | No |
