Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Xeon E3-1230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7940HS is 4316 days newer than Xeon E3-1230.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
- Performs up to 30% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E3-1230 - 130 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E3-1230
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 9 7940HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1230
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
588
23.805668016194332%
Multi-Core
1975
16.987785996903494%
Intel Xeon E3-1230 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
