Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 8640U outperforms Xeon E3-1230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 8640U is 4630 days newer than Xeon E3-1230.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
- Performs up to 13% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E3-1230 - 132 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 28 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1230
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 5 8640U
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1230
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
588
23.69057211925866%
Multi-Core
1975
22.52252252252252%
Intel Xeon E3-1230 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
