Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1230 v5 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1230 v5 is 1330 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
- Performs up to 27% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6200 - 175 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 80 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |