Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1586 days newer than Xeon E3-1230 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E3-1230 v3 - 129 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
129
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1859 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |