Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Xeon E3-1226 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2501 days newer than Xeon E3-1226 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 41% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 464 vs 328 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 - 12 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
464
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5402 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell, Haswell-WS | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |