Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3868 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 54% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1225 - 706 vs 457 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 24 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
706
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$273.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $273.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |