Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 717 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 80 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1225 v5 - 178 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 - 6 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$148.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $148.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7477 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |