Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1225 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2687W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1225 v3 is 453 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2687W - 169 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 84 vs 150 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 16 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1225 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Xeon E5-2687W
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2687W |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
