Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2908 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 8% better in Fortnite than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 230 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$235.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $235.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |