Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3284 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400H - 17 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 211 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Tiger Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 45 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |