Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11260H outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11260H is 3284 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11260H
- Performs up to 19% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 118 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E3-1220L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i5-11260H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-11260H |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 17 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
