Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3897 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 241 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
241
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$369
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $369 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |