Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Xeon E3-1220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 2837 days newer than Xeon E3-1220.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1220 - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 - 15 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E3-1220
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
