Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Xeon E3-1220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 3017 days newer than Xeon E3-1220.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1220 - 200 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2631 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |