Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1220 v5 outperforms Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1220 v5 is 1744 days newer than Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-2500 - 173 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
168
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$194.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $194.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |