Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1220 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1220 v3 is 91 days older than Xeon E5-2690 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3
- Performs up to 11% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 672 vs 608 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 80 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 20 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E3-1220 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Xeon E5-2690 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 130 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
