Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1220 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1220 v3 is 453 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2690 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 80 vs 135 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1220 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Xeon E5-2690
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2690 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 135 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
