Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11800H outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11800H is 3284 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11800H
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 127 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 45 vs 69 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-11800H |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Tiger Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 45 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |