Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3228 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 69 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 25% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 285 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
285
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |