Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2902 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 28% better in Starfield than Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 59 vs 46 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 65 vs 69 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |