Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 421 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 6% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 290 vs 274 FPS
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 32 vs 16 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
274
94%
Value, $/FPS
$2.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$810
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $810 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1070 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2388G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics P750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |