Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E-2324G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 307 days older than Xeon E-2324G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2324G
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E-2324G - 193 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2324G - 24 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$294.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $294.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2324G | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics P750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |