Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600 outperforms Xeon E-2314 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600 is 483 days newer than Xeon E-2314.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E-2314 - 193 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E-2314 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2314 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |