Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 119 days older than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 45 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Xeon E-2276M - 198 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 56 vs 12 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2019 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Xeon W |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 3647 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 28 |
| 12 | Threads | 56 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 255 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
