Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 222 days older than Ryzen 7 4800HS.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 7 4800HS - 243 vs 242 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 35 vs 45 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 16 vs 12 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Ryzen 7 4800HS
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS |
|---|---|---|
| May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2020 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Renoir |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket FP6 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 448SP |
| No | Overclockable | No |
