Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Xeon E-2176M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 703 days newer than Xeon E-2176M.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 2% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E-2176M - 183 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2176M - 35 vs 45 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2176M - 16 vs 12 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2176M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 7th, 2020 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Renoir |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket FP6 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 512SP |
No | Overclockable | No |