Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Xeon E-2176M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 751 days newer than Xeon E-2176M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Xeon E-2176M - 205 vs 201 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5936 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2176M | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |