Buy on Amazon
$210
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $317
Availability
MSRP in USD: $317
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $422
Availability
MSRP in USD: $422
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Xeon E-2146G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 978 days newer than Xeon E-2146G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2146G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 11% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E-2146G - 207 vs 186 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2146G - 65 vs 80 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E-2146G
Server/Workstation • Jul 12th, 2018
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2146G | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E-2146G or Core i9-11900F
World of Warcraft, 1920 x 1080, Maximum
172 FPS
$6.1/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Core i9-11900F
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,049.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
