Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1603 days older than the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Up to 95% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $75.34 vs $1595.95
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 58 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Pentium Gold G6405 - 119 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 44 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $75.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77130 minutes ago
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
848
72.17021276595744%
Multi-Core
1760
18.297120282773676%
Intel Pentium Gold G6405 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Pentium Gold | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 22 |
4 | Threads | 44 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 145 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |