Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms the cheaper Pentium Gold G6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium Gold G6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1283 days older than the cheaper Pentium Gold G6400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Up to 82% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $73.66 vs $399.99
- Up to 81% better value when playing Rocket League than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.11 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 58 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Rocket League than Pentium Gold G6400 - 705 vs 688 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 44 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
688
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$73.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $73.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13611 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
705
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
19%
Price, $
$399.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13607 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G6400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Pentium Gold | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 22 |
4 | Threads | 44 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 145 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |