Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Pentium Gold G6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 320 days newer than Pentium Gold G6400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Pentium Gold G6400 - 122 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $83.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G6400 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium Gold | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |