Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3819 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G840.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G840
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $45.0 vs $154.65
- Up to 62% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-12600KF - $0.39 vs $1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 32% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G840 - 152 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
38%
Price, $
$154.65
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $154.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G840 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |