Buy on Amazon
$37.5
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $87
Availability
MSRP in USD: $87
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $37.5 vs $259.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-10900F - $0.17 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Pentium G6950 - 246 vs 227 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 20 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
227
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.5
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G6950 Processor 2.8GHz 3 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $37.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
16%
Price, $
$259.99
14%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $259.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 73 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
