Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 3288 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - $37.5 vs $389.95
- Up to 88% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-9700KF - $0.25 vs $2.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G6950 - 181 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 8 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
148
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Buy for $389.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |