Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2797 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $40.99 vs $211.95
- Up to 67% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-10700KF - $0.17 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 71% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Pentium G645 - 405 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 16 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
237
58.51851851851851%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$40.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $40.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
405
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
32.69230769230769%
Price, $
$211.95
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $211.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |