Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Pentium G645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 51 days newer than Pentium G645.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Pentium G645 - 168 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2680 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |