Key Differences
In short — Core i5-760 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G640 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-760 is 686 days older than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $30.0 vs $88.2
- Up to 67% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-760 - $0.13 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Performs up to 0% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Pentium G640 - 224 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 4 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
FPS
223
99.55357142857143%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$30
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
224
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
33.33333333333333%
Price, $
$88.2
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $88.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |