Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 238 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - $30.74 vs $75.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-3770 - $0.14 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 16% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Pentium G630 - 264 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 8 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
227
85.98484848484848%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$30.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $30.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
393
58.56929955290611%
Multi-Core
683
29.708568943018705%
Intel Pentium G630 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |