Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3481 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $30.74 vs $140.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-11600 - $0.13 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 23% better in Ready or Not than Pentium G630 - 286 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 12 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
232
81.11888111888112%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$30.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $30.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1998 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
286
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
26.53061224489796%
Price, $
$140
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2007 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
393
18.520263901979263%
Multi-Core
683
8.341475329750855%
Intel Pentium G630 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |