Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4620 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4620 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Performs up to 33% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than FX-8320 - 64 vs 48 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 37% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $95.0 vs $149.99
- Up to 15% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Pentium G4620 - $1.98 vs $2.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 8 vs 4 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
64
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.34/FPS
84.61538461538461%
Price, $
$149.99
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41235 minutes ago
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41231 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |