Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3460 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3460 is 595 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3460
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1610 - 256 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Pentium G3460
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
69.49429037520392%
Multi-Core
739
70.78544061302682%
Intel Pentium G3460 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
