Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3420 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3420 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3420.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $71.68 vs $279.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-10700K - $0.61 vs $2.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Pentium G3420 - 136 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3420 - 16 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
118
86.76470588235294%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$71.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $71.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
29.756097560975615%
Price, $
$279
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
584
34.23212192262602%
Multi-Core
981
12.048636698599854%
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |