Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3420 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3420 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 1874 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3420.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $21.1 vs $160.91
- Up to 86% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-9400 - $0.19 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Pentium G3420 - 121 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3420 - 6 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
112
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$21.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $21.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8059 minutes ago
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8060 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |