Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3420 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3420 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3420.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $71.62 vs $139.99
- Up to 3% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i3-10320 - $0.67 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 91% better in Diablo IV than Pentium G3420 - 204 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3420 - 8 vs 2 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
107
52.450980392156865%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$71.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $71.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
97.10144927536233%
Price, $
$139.99
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
584
37.94671864847303%
Multi-Core
981
21.20622568093385%
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |